Seminar in Natural Science (online) |
PLS 391 | ||
|
Web-based Research Presentation Your research project will culminate in a web-based presentation posted to the Discussion Board, your contribution to our very own 391 online conference, a festival of research presentations about current scientific issues and controversies. This research-based assignment takes the place of the traditional 7-10 page research paper I've used in past sections of 391. While this project uses your critical thinking skills and requires some research, it is weighted less heavily than a long paper assignment (50 instead of 100 points, to be precise), and from my experience is using the assignment in past seminars, it's definitely more fun.
An Important Point: You do not need advanced technical skills to do this assignment well. My past students have proven this beyond a doubt, as some of those who were most insecure about or inexperienced with the technical aspects of the project ended up producing excellent presentations. Remember that bells and whistles do not substitute for good content! Developing and Organizing Your Argument By the time you start writing your presentation, your thinking about your topic should have been influenced/informed by your research and my comments on your proposal. One question to ask yourself is, "Does my original thesis (from the proposal) still hold, or should I frame the argument differently?" This will depend on what kind of evidence you've uncovered in your research and how your analysis of that evidence relates to your topic. Another question concerns organization. Consider alternative organizational strategies for your discussion, based on your proposal outline but also the information you've found in your research. Look through your notes, and rearrange your information to fit your project (this may take cutting and pasting). Try different arrangements: by topic, by geographical area, chronologically. Each time, ask yourself: does this make sense? Does it make more sense any other way? Once you figure out your organizing scheme, be sure to support your major points/claims with appropriate information, such as examples, statistics, and reasoned analysis (whatever is appropriate to your topic). Make sure that each section of your paper relates in a logical way to your overall thesis, and that the flow of information makes sense to a first-time reader of your draft. Consider alternative viewpoints to your thesis, and how they should be acknowledged/incorporated within your discussion. A common misconception is that acknowledging objections to an argument can weaken one's thesis. The opposite is true, as long as you're able to answer these objections effectively and deal with alternative viewpoints/explanations fairly and judiciously. Neglecting to even mention objections/alternatives to your argument can raise the suspicions of skeptical readers. A few tips related to presenting historical information, statistical data, and visuals:
Writing the Conclusion Don't make your conclusion a boring reiteration of your introduction. This is a chance for you to review the major points of your research/argument, make an overall judgment about your findings, and make any specific recommendations, if applicable. A solid paragraph or two should suffice. Documentation You will need to document your presentation properly and thoroughly by citing the source of each image you use as well as any quotations or paraphrases from outside sources, whether web- or print-based. (Don't worry about getting permissions for images, as this presentation is strictly for educational purposes in our class.) Just as in a traditional paper, quotations need to be indicated as such, paraphrases must be in your own words and cited, etc. In other words, it must be crystal clear which ideas/words are your own, and which are from outside sources. For more information, see Using and Documenting Sources. More on Using Sources -- How Many, What Kind? You should plan on citing a minimum of five legitimate sources, two of which must be print-based (e.g., book, journal article, government document, etc.). Sources used merely for images do not count toward the total. If a web-based source also exists in print format (as do some books, journals, government documents, and most newspapers), it can count as a print source. In addition, at least two of your sources must be peer-reviewed, or "refereed." See this page from "Using and Documenting Sources" for additional info on peer-reviewed sources. General encyclopedias (e.g., Microsoft Encarta) and dictionaries do not count as legitimate sources in this context, although more specialized reference works may, particularly those focused on science. Email me if you have questions about a particular source. Remember that most readers (including me!) are impressed when a researcher cites a variety of sources; in contrast, citing five newspaper articles and one magazine blurb does not demonstrate thorough, college-level research. As you write, be careful of becoming a "quote-gatherer"--one who merely gathers lots of neat-sounding quotations and strings them together. First and foremost you must put forth your own analysis and argument about your subject. Stress summarizing and paraphrasing as you incorporate sources into your paper; use quotes sparingly and judiciously (i.e., when you want to retain the force and effect of the original author's language). This way your citations will complement your own voice instead of overshadowing it. Plus, by paraphrasing sources instead of quoting them, you demonstrate your intellectual mastery of the material. Presentation Format -- Options and Tips Designing a "web presentation" might thrill some people but scare others half to death -- so let me assure you here and now that I'm not expecting some amazing technical achievement out of this assignment (which, after all, is weighted less than the critical essays). The key thing here is that you research various sources to expand, inform, and even challenge your own analysis; incorporate some images and web links from your research to complement the text in your presentation; and document your research accurately and thoroughly. Yes, you want the presentation to be visually appealing and well-organized; but it's more important to have good ideas, to explain them precisely and clearly, to challenge and enlighten your fellow scholars, and to document your information when appropriate. You can design your online presentation in a few different ways:
|
Mike Bryson Associate Professor College of Professional Studies Roosevelt University mb's Courses
Page mb's Home Page
Last updated
09/09/09 |